Planning
Lesson
Lesson planning is the art combining
a number of different elements into a coherent whole so that the lesson has an
identity which student can recognizes, work within, and react to- whatever
metaphor teachers may use to visualize and create, that identity. But plans-
which help teachers identify aims and anticipate potential problems- are
proposals for action rather than scripts to be followed slavishly, whether they
are detailed documents or hastily scribbled notes.
a. Pre
planning
Before
we start to make a lesson plan we need to consider a number of crucial factors
such as the language level of our student, their educational and cultural
background, their likely levels of motivation and their different learning
styles. Such knowledge is, of course. When we are not yet familiar with the
character of a group, we need to do our best to gain as much understanding of
them as we can before starting to make decisions about what to teach.
We also need knowledge
of the context and organization of the syllabus and the curriculum we are
working with them and their requirements of any exams which the student are
working towards.
Armed now with our
knowledge of the student and of the syllabus we can go on to consider the four
main planning elements:
·
Activities:
When planning. It is vital to consider what students will be doing in the
classroom; we have to consider the way they will be grouped, whether they are
to move around the class, whether they will be involved in a boisterous
group-writing activity.
We should make decisions about activities almost
independently of what language or skills we have to teach. Our first planning
thought should Centre round what kind of activity would be best for a
particular point in a lesson, or on particular of day. By deciding what kind of
activity to offer them- in the most general sense- we have a chance to balance
the exercise in our lesson in order to offer the best possible chance of
engaging and motivating the class.
·
Skills: We need to make decisions about which
language skills we wish our student develop. This choice sometimes determined
by the syllabus or the coursebook. However, we still and what sub-skills we
wish to practice.
Planning decisions about language skills and sub-skills
are co-dependent with the content of the lesson and with the activities which
the teachers with get the students to take part in.
·
Language:
We need to decide what language to introduce and have the students learn,
practice, research, or use.
One
of the dangers of planning is that where language is the main focus it is the
first and only planning decisions that teachers make. Once the decision has
been taken into teach the present continuous, for examples: it’s sometimes
tempting to slip back into a drill-dominated teaching session which lacks
variety and which may not be the best way to achieve our aims. But language is
only one area that we need to consider when we planning lesson.
·
Content:
Lesson planners have to select content which has good chance of provoking
interest and involvement. Since they know their student personally they are
well placed to select appropriate content.
Even
where the choice of subject and content it’s to some extent dependent on a
coursebook, we can still judge when and if to use the coursebook’s topics, or
whether to replace them with something else. We can predict, with some
accuracy, which topics will work and which will not.
When
we thinking about elements we have discussed above we carry with us not only
the knowledge of the student, but also we belief in the need to create an
appropriate balance between variety and coherence. With all of these features
in mind we can finally pas all our thinking through the filter of practical
reality, where have available, and the attitude of the institution we work in
all combine to focus page shows, we are in position to move from pre-planning
to the plan itself.
![]() |
![]() |
Pre-planning
and the plan
B.
The plan
Having
done some pre-planning and made decisions about the kind of lesson we want to
teach, we can make the lesson plan. This may take a number of different forms,
depending upon circumstances of the lesson and depending also, on our attitude
to planning in general.
B.1 The planning continuum
The way that teachers plan lesson depends
upon the circumstances in which the lesson is to take place and on the teacher’s
experience. Near one end of a planning continuum, teachers may do all the
(vague) pre-planning in their head and make actual decisions about what to
include in the lesson as they hurry along the corridor to the class.
Another
scenario near the same end of the continuum occurs when the teachers are
following a coursebook and they do exactly what the book says, letting the
cuorsebook writers, in effect, do their planning for them. This is especially
attractive for teachers under extreme time pressure, though if we do not spend
time thinking about how to use the coursebook activities (and what happen when
we do) we may run into difficulties later.
At
the very end of the planning continuum is the kind of lesson described by one
writer as the jungle path where teachers walk into class with the no real idea
of what they are going to do.
Experienced teacher may
well be able to run effective lesson in this way, without writing a plan at all.
When such lessons are successful they can be immensely according for all
concerned.
At
the other end of the continuum teacher write formal plans for their classes
which detail what they are going to do and why, perhaps because they are about
to be observed or because they are required to do so by some throaty.
B.2 Making a plan
The following example
of making a plan exemplifies how a teacher might proceed from pre planning to a
final plan.
·
Pre-planning background: for the lesson,
some of the fact of the feed into pre-planning decisions as following:
1.
The class it’s in intermediate level. There
are 31 students. They are between the ages of 18 and 31. They are enthusiastic
and participate well when not overtired.
2.
The student need “waking up’ at the
begging of lesson.
3.
They are quite prepared to ‘have a go’
with creative activities.
4.
Lesson take place in a light classroom
equipped with a whiteboard and overhead projector.
5.
The overall topic thread into the lesson
fits involves forms of transport and different travelling environments. In the
coursebook this will change next week to the topic.
6.
The next item of the grammar syllabus is
the construction should have+done.
7.
The students have not had any reading
skills work recently.
8.
The students need more oral fluency
work.
·
Pre-planning decisions: as a result of
the background information listed above the teachers takes the following
decisions:
a. The
lesson should include on oral fluency activity.
b. The
lesson should include the introduction of should have+done
c. It
would be nice to have some reading in the lesson.
d. The
lesson should continue with the transport theme-but make it significantly
different in some way.
·
The plan: on the basis of our pre
planning decisions we now make our plan. The probable sequence of the lesson
will be:
a.
An oral fluency activity with ‘changing
groups’ in which students have to reach a decisions about what five personal
possessions they would take into space.
b.
Reading for prediction and the gist, in
which students are asked to say what they except to be in a text about a space
station, before reading a check their predictions and then reading again for
detailed understanding.
c.
Ending the story, in which students
quickly devise an ending for the story.
d.
New language introduction in which the
teacher elicits ‘should have’ sentences and has students say them successfully.
e.
Language practice in which students talk
about things they did or did not to do, and which they should not or should
have done.
f.
A space job interview in which students
plan and role play and interview for a job in a space station.
The
formal plan
Formal
plans are sometimes required, especially when, for example, the teacher are to
be observed and /or assessed as part of a training scheme or for reasons of
internal quality control. A formal plan must contain some elements of the
following are:
a. Class
description and timetable fit:
The
class description tells us about who the students are, and what can be expected
of them.

We also need to say
where the lesson fits sequence of classes (the before and after) as in the
following example:
![]() |
The lesson aims: the
best classroom aims are specific and directed towards and outcome which can be
measured.
![]() |
Activities,
procedures and timing: the main body of a formal plan lists the activities and
procedures in that lesson, together with the times we expect each of them to
take. We will include the aids we are going to use, and show the different
interactions which will take place in the class.



|
Activity/Aids
|
Interaction
|
Procedure
|
Time
|
1
|
Group
decision-making
Pen
and paper
|
a.
![]()
b. S,S,S
c.
![]()
d.
![]()
(GG)
e.
![]() |
T tells students to list five things they would take into
space with them (apart from essentials).
SS make their lists individually.
In pairs students have to negotiate their items, to come
up with a shared list of only five items to take to a space station.
Pairs join with other pairs the new groups have to
negotiate their items to take to a space station.
The T encourage the groups to compare their.
|
1’
2’
3’
4’
3’
|
Problems
and possibilities: a good plan tries to predict potential pitfalls and suggest
ways of dealing with them. It also includes alternative activities in case we
find it necessary to divert from the lesson sequence we had hoped to follow.
When listing anticipated problems it is a good idea
to think ahead to possible solutions we might adopt to resolve them, as in the
following example:
Anticipated problems
|
Possible solutions
|
Students may not be able to think of items
to take to a space station with them for activity.
|
I will keep eyes open and go to prompt any
individuals into look ‘vacant’ or puzzled with question, about what music,
books, pictures, etc. They might want to take.
|
Student may have trouble contracting ‘should
not have’ in activity.
|
I will do some isolation and until they
distortion work until they can say.
|

Planning
a sequence of lesson
·
Before
and during: however
carefully we plan, in practice unforeseen things and likely to happen during
the course of a lesson and so our plans are continually modified in the light
of these. Even more than a plan for an individual lesson, a scheme of work for
weeks or month of lesson is only a proposal of what we hope to achieve in that
time.
·
Short
and long-term goals: however motivated a student may be at
the beginning of a course, the level of that motivation may fall dramatically
if the student is not engaged or if they cannot see where they are going – or
know when they have got there.
When
a plan sequence of lessons, we need to build in goals for both students and
ourselves to aim at, whether they are end of week tests, or major revision
lesson. That way we can hope to give our students a staged progression of
successfully met challenges.
·
Thematic
strands: one way to approach a sequence of lesson is to
focus on different content in each individual lesson. This will certainly
provide variety. It might be better, however, for themes to carry over for more
than one lesson, or at least to reappear, so that the students perceive some
coherent topic strands as the course progress.
·
Language
planning: when we plan language input over a sequence of
lessons we want to propose a sensible progression of syllabus elements such as
grammar, lexis, and functions. We also want to build in sufficient
opportunities for recycling or remembering language, and for using language in
productive skill work. If we are following a coursebook closely, many of these
decisions may already have been taken, but even in such circumstances we need
to keep a constants eye on how things are going, and with the knowledge of
‘before and after’ modify the programme we are working from when necessary.
·
Activity
balance: the balance of activities over a sequence of
lesson is one of the features which will determine the overall level of student
involvement in the course. If we get it right, it will also provide the widest
range of experience to meet the different learning styles of the students in
the class
Over period of weeks or months we would expect
students to have receive a varied diet of activities: they should not have to
role-play every day, nor would we expect every lesson to be devoted exclusively
to language study. There is a danger, too, that they might become bored if
every Friday was speaking and writing. In such a scenario the level of
predictability may have gone beyond the sufficient to the exaggerated. What we
are looking for, instead, is a blend of the familiar and the new.
C.
Using lesson plan
However carefully we plan, and whatever form our
plan takes, we will still have to use that plan in the classroom, and use our
plans as record of learning for reference.
C.1 Action and reaction
Planning a lesson is not the same as scripting the
lesson. Wherever our preparations fit on the planning continuum,what we are take
into the lessons a proposal in action, rather than a lesson blueprint to be
followed slavishly. And our proposal for action, transformed into action in the
classroom.
·
Magic
moments: some of the most affecting moments in language
lessons happen when a conversation develops unexpectedly, or when a topic
produces a level of interest in our student which we had not predicted. The
occurrence of such magic moments helps to provide and sustain a group’s
motivation.
·
Sensible
diversion: another reason for diversion from our originally
plan is when something happen which we simply cannot ignore, whether this is a
surprising students reaction to reading text, or the sudden announcement that
someone getting married! In the case of opportunistic teaching, we take the
opportunity to teach language that has suddenly come up, similarly, something
might occur to us in terms of topic or in terms of a language connection which
we suddenly want to develop on the spot.
·
Unforeseen
problems: however well we plan, unforeseen problems often
crop up. Some student may find an activity that we thought interesting
incredibly boring: an activity may take more or less time than we anticipated.
It is possible that something we thought would be fairly simple for our student
turn out to be different difficult. We may have planned an activity based on
the number of students we expected to turn up, only to find that some of them
are absent.
In any of the above
scenario it would be almost impossible to carry on with our plan as if nothing
had happened: if an activity finished quickly we have to find something else to
fill the time.
It is possible to
anticipate potential problems in the class and to plan strategies to deal with
them.
However well we plan,
our plan is just a suggestion of what we might do in class. Everything depends
upon how our students respond and related to it.
Written plans
are not just proposal for future action; they are also of what has taken place.
Thus, when we are in middle of a sequence of lessons, we can look back at what
we have done in order to decide what to do next.
Our
originally written plans will, therefore have to be modified in the light of what
actually happened in the classes we taught. This may simply mean crossing out
the original activity tittle or coursebookpage number and replacing it with
what we used in reality. However if we have time to record how we and the
students experienced the lesson, reflecting carefully on successfully and less
successful activities, not only will this help us to make changes if and when
we want to use the same activities again, but it will so lead us to think about
how we teach and consider changes in both activities and approach.